Computational study of characteristics of intake flow in model axial compressor with regard to different variants of “active disk” boundary condition
Authors: Voronich I.V., Nguyen V.H. | Published: 20.05.2019 |
Published in issue: #5(710)/2019 | |
Category: Aviation, Rocket and Technology | Chapter: Aerodynamics and Heat Transfer Processes in Aircraft | |
Keywords: turbojet engine, axial compressor air intake, active disk, variables profiles, computational technique |
Aerodynamic interaction between the compressor (fan) and the air intake is a characteristic feature of modern turbojet engines of civil aviation. An approach based on unsteady three-dimensional modeling of the flow taking into account full blade rows is necessary for analysis but is too resource-intensive for design. In some cases, an approach based on the “active disk” boundary condition can be successfully used to analyze aerodynamic interference of the engine with airframe elements. In the present work, the flow characteristics in the air intake of a model axial compressor JT8D are studied and different variants of the “active disk” boundary condition that can replace the compressor in the air intake are compared. The results of the computational study of characteristics of the axial compressor model in nacelle based on a pre-validated technique are presented. An analysis of integral characteristics and profiles of variables in different cross-sections at rotational speeds constituting 70, 80 and 90 % of the design value is performed. The results obtained using different variants of the “active disk” boundary condition are compared, and a preferred variant is selected. For the configuration in question, the method has proven to be efficient and accurate.
References
[1] Teoriya i raschet vozdushno-reaktivnykh dvigateley [Theory and calculation of air-jet engines]. Ed. Shlyakhtenko S.M. Moscow, Mashinostroyeniye publ., 1987. 568 p.
[2] Mattingly J.D., Heiser W.H., Pratt D.T. Aircraft engine design. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2002. 684 p.
[3] Gel’medov F.Sh., Lanshin A.I., Chelombit’ko A.V., Shvets L.I. Efficiency of control of KND guide vanes in turbofan engines with fan drive through a reducer. Engine, 2012, no. 3(81), pp. 1–4 (in Russ.).
[4] Owens R., Hasel K., Mapes D. Ultra high bypass turbofan technologies for the twenty-first century. 26th AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 1990, paper AIAA-90-2397, 9 p.
[5] Hall C.A., Crichton D. Engine design studies for a silent aircraft. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2007, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 479–487, doi: 10.1115/1.2472398
[6] Larkin M.J., Schweiger P.S. Ultra high bypass nacelle aerodynamics: inlet flow-through nacelle high angle of attack distortion test. NASA CR-189149, 1992. 73 p.
[7] Yao J., Gorrell S.E., Wadia A.R. High-Fidelity Numerical Analysis of Per-Rev-Type Inlet Distortion Transfer in Multistage Fans – Part I: Simulations with Selected Blade Rows. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, 2008, vol. 6, iss. PART A, pp. 469–480, doi: 10.1115/GT2008-50813
[8] Fidalgo V.J., Hall C.A., Colin Y. A Study of Fan-Distortion Interaction within the NASA Rotor 67 Transonic Stage. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2012, vol. 134, no. 5, p. 1, doi: 10.1115/1.4003850
[9] Voronich I.V., Nguyen V.H. Modeling the characteristics of an axial compressor in the context of a test experiment. Materials 59 scientific conference MIPT [Proceedings of the 59th All-Russian Scientific Conference MIPT]. Dolgoprudny, 2016.
[10] Moore R.D., Kovich G., Tysl E.R. Aerodynamic performance of 0.4066-scale model of JT8D refan stage. NASA TM X-3356, 1976. 156 p.
[11] Schuehle A.L. 727 Airplane Side Inlet Low-Speed Performance Confirmation Model Test for Refanned JT8D Engines. NASA CR-134609, 1974. 80 p.
[12] Compression and gas moving. ANSYS, Inc. Available at: https:// www.ansys.com/ solutions/solutions-by-industry/industrial-equipment-and-rotating-machinery/ compression-and-gas-moving (accessed 15 December 2018).
[13] Liu B., An G., Yu X. Assessment of curvature correction and reattachment modification into the shear stress transport model within the subsonic axial compressor simulations. Journal of Power and Energy, 2015, vol. 229(8), pp. 910–927, doi: 10.1177/0957650915595168
[14] Zhao Y., Wang G.Y., Huang B., Hu C.L. Applications of a curvature correction turbulent model for computations of unsteady cavitating flows. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2015, vol. 72, iss. forum 2, no. art. 022006, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/72/2/022006
[15] Shcoenweitz D., Theune M., Schnell R. Inlet Distortion Sensitivity of Fans with Different Pressure Ratios. ISABE, 2015, paper 2015_20095. Available at: https://drc.libraries.uc.edu/handle/2374.UC/745699 (accessed 15 December 2018).
[16] Godard B., De Jaeghere E., Ben Nasr N., Marty J., Barrier R., Gourdain N. A review of inlet-fan coupling methodologies. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, 2017, paper GT2017-63577, doi: 10.1115/GT2017-63577