Validation of Methods for Calculating Hydrogen Combustion in a Supersonic Model Air Flow Using the Experimental Data of Beach — Evans — Schexnayder
Authors: Kukshinov N.V., Batura S.N., Frantsuzov M.S. | Published: 26.11.2019 |
Published in issue: #11(716)/2019 | |
Category: Aviation, Rocket and Technology | Chapter: Aerodynamics and Heat Transfer Processes in Aircraft | |
Keywords: hydrogen combustion, chemical kinetics, turbulent flow, turbulence models, numerical simulation, supersonic flow |
This paper deals with numerical simulation of combustion of a hydrogen-air mixture in a supersonic flow. The simulation is based on solving the complete system of Navier-Stokes equations with closure using the turbulence model and detailed chemical kinetics. The mixing and combustion of a hydrogen-air fuel mixture is considered in the experimental formulation of Beach-Evans-Schexnayder. The effect of various kinetic mechanisms, turbulence models, TCI models, and boundary conditions on the solution is studied qualitatively and quantitatively. The relative errors of mass concentration of water for control sections are determined, and the methods’ boundaries are shown. Conclusions are drawn on the influence of turbulent mixing mechanisms and chemical kinetics on the combustion of hydrogen.
References
[1] Steelant J., Marini M., Pezella G., Reimann B., Chernyshev S.L., Gubanov A.A., Talyzin V.A., Voevodenko N.V., Kukshinov N.V., Prokhorov A.N., Neely A.J., Kenell C., Verstraete D., Buttsworth D. Numerical and Experimental Research on Aerodynamics of High-Speed Passenger Vehicle within the HEXAFLY-INT Project. Proceedings of 30th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, 25–30 September 2016, Daejeon Convention Center (DCC)Daejeon, South Korea, 2016, code 126186.
[2] Mehta U., Aftosmis M., Bowles J., Pandya S. Skylon airframe aerodynamics and SABRE plumes. 20th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, 6–9 July 2015, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 2015, code 124139.
[3] Shiryayeva A.A. Application of a Partially Stirred Reactor Model for Taking into Account the Turbulence/Combustion Interaction on the Basis of Reynolds Equations. TsAGI Science Journal, 2018, no. 8, pp. 27–39 (in Russ.).
[4] Burrows M.C., Kurkov A.P. An Analytical and Experimental Study of Supersonic Combustion of Hydrogen in Vitiated Air Stream. AIAA Journal, 1973, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1217–1218, doi: 10.2514/3.50564
[5] Anderson G.Y., Gooderum P.B. Exploratory tests of two strut fuel injectors for supersonic combustion. Technical Report. NASA TN D-7581, 1974. 49 p.
[6] Roudakov A.S., Semenov V.L., Hicks J.W. Recent Flight Test Results of the Joint CIAM-NASA Mach 6.5 Scramjet Flight Program. Technical Report. NASA TP-1998-206548, 1998, 15 p.
[7] Voland R.T., Auslender A.H., Smart M.K., Roudakov A.S., Semenov V.L., Kopchenov V. CIAM/NASA Mach 6.5 scramjet flight and ground test. 9th International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, 1999, 9 p.
[8] Odam J., Paull A. Comparison of experimental thrust measurements with theoretical values for a scramjet engine. 12th International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, 2003, Norfolk, VA, United States, 15–19 December 2003, code 102998.
[9] Xing F., Cai J., Huang Y., Yao Y. Numerical Analysis of HyShot Scramjet Model with Different Throat Heights. 21st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference, 2017, 12 p.
[10] Evans J.S., Schexnayder C.J., Beach H.L. Application of Two — Dimensional Parabolic. Computer Program to Prediction of Turbulent Reacting Flows. NASA TP-1169, 1978.
[11] Gulyaev A.N., Kozlov V.E., Sekundov A.N. A universal one-equation model for turbulent viscosity. Fluid Dynamics, 1993, vol. 28, iss. 4, pp. 485–494.
[12] Menter F.R. Zonal two equation k–ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper, 1993, no. 93-2906, 21 p, doi: 10.2514/6.1993-2906
[13] Langtry R.B., Menter F.R. Correlation-Based Transition Modeling for Unstructured Parallelized Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes. AIAA Journal, 2009, vol. 47, № 12, pp. 2894–2900, doi: 10.2514/1.42362
[14] Dimitrow V.I. The maximum kinetic mechanism and rate constants in the H2–O2 System. Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters, 1977, vol. 7, no. 1, pp 81–86, doi: 10.1007/BF02068557
[15] Hong Z., Davidson D.F., Hanson R.K. An improved H2/O2 mechanism based on recent shock tube/laser absorption measurements. Combustion and Flame, 2011, vol. 158, pp. 633–644, doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.10.002
[16] Bezgin L.V., Kopchenov V.I., Sharipov A.S., Titova N.S., Starik A.M. Evaluation of Prediction Ability of Detailed Reaction Mechanisms in the Combustion Performance in Hydrogen/Air Supersonic Flows. Combustion Science and Technology, 2013, vol. 185, iss. 1, pp. 62–94, doi: 10.1080/00102202.2012.709562
[17] Sabelnikov V., Deshaies B., Figueira L.F., Silva D.A. Revisited flame let model for non-premixed combustion in supersonic turbulent flows. Combustion and flame, 1998, vol. 114, pp. 577–584, doi 10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00296-4