An Analysis of Increasing Thrust of an Air Propeller Through Additional Lift Surface

Air propellers used in small scale unmanned aircraft operate at low Reynolds numbers. The aerody-namic force occurring on the blade when the air propeller is in operation is of variable nature. It is observed that for Reynold numbers below 5⋅105 flow separation can occur on some sections of the propeller surface. To deal with the problem, increase the lift on the blade and therefore, reduce the turbulence boundary level, a new design called bi-blade propeller is developed and patented. This design features an additional blade above the main one. Using ANSYS Fluent, samples of the bi-blade propellers were investigated to determine the positions where the inductive resistence and the turbulence boundary level decreased, and the lift increased when the air propeller was in operation. A comparison study was conducted in laboratory conditions to investigate static thrust of the bi-blade propeller on a test bench at 2000–4500 мин–1. The bi-blade propeller was compared with a conventional propeller.

References

[1] Gerasimov O.V., Kritskiy B.S. Calculation of propeller UAV based Reynolds number and degree of reduction. Civil Aviation High TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, no. 200, pp. 79–85 (in Russ.).

[2] Mueller T.J., DeLaurier J.D. Aerodynamics of Small Vehicles. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2003, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 89–111, doi: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.35.101101.161102

[3] Brandt J.B., Selig M.S. Propeller Performance Data at Low Reynolds Numbers. 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 4–7 January 2011, Orlando, FL, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. publ., 2011, pp. 1–18.

[4] Lipin A.V., Ostroukhov S.P., Serokhvostov S.V., Ustinov M.V., Flaksman Ya.Sh., Shustov A.V. An experimental study of the dependence of propeller characteristics on the Reynolds number. TsAGI Science Journal, 2007, vol. XXXVIII, no. 3–4, pp. 102–110 (in Russ.).

[5] Brylyakov A.P., Zharkova G.M., Zanin B.Yu., Kovrizhina V.N., Sboyev D.S. Flow separation in the forward wing with increased external turbulence. TsAGI Science Journal, 2004, vol. XXXV, no. 1–2, pp. 57–62 (in Russ.).

[6] Trunev A. Theory and constants of wall turbulence. Scientific Journal of KubSAU, 2010, no. 58(04), pp. 383–394. Available at: http://ej.kubagro.ru/2010/04/pdf/24.pdf (accessed 15 May 2019).

[7] Deters R.W., Ananda G.K., Selig M.S. Reynolds Number Effects on the Performance of Small-Scale Propellers. 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2014, Atlanta, GA, United States, 16–20 June 2014, p. 106134, doi: 10.2514/6.2014-2151

[8] Selig M.S., McGranahan B.D. Wind Tunnel Aerodynamic Tests of Six Airfoils for Use on Small Wind Turbines. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 2004, vol. 126(4), pp. 986–1001, doi: 10.1115/1.1793208

[9] Ruiz-Calavera L.P., Perdones-Diaz D. CFD based aeroelastic calculation of propeller loads. 28th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2012, vol. 1, pp. 836–846.

[10] Wald Q.R. The aerodynamics of propellers. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2006, vol. 42, iss. 2, pp. 85–128, doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2006.04.001

[11] Batzorigt E., Yondon E. Bi-blade high efficiency propeller. 18th International Conference on the Methods of Aerophysical Research (ICMAR-2016), Perm, Russia, June 27–July 3, 2016, Perm, Russia, 2016, vol. 1770.