Standardization of spherical high-pressure vessels comprising composite shells and metallic liners

The standardization of high-pressure vessels (HPV) comprising composite shells and metallic liners is an important problem. However, the literature on choosing the parameters of the standard structures containing compressed and liquefied gases is still lacking. An ap proach proposed in this paper implies optimizing HPV structural and technological parameters with respect to the cost criterion or technological cost criterion. The latter includes only the cost of winding a composite shell and does not include the cost of materials. The study has shown that: if the cost of materials is high, the second criterion is more sensitive; production expenses can be considerably reduced by implementing automatic winding at a low cost; the zonal winding of high-pressure combined composite vessels provides lower values of tangential stresses as compared to the meridional stresses. The difference between the tangential and meridional stresses increases from the equator to the sleeves. It is characteristic for the zonal winding that the meridional stresses oscillate in the angular coordinate. Their amplitudes increase with decreasing the number of winding zones. The thickness of the liner near the sleeves is chosen from the condition that the composite structure could withstand angular loads. The liner thickness variation law is suggested. The proposed recommendations concerning the HPV design and technology standardization will significantly reduce production costs in mechanical engineering.

References

[1] Tarasov V.A., Baraev A.V., Filimonov A.S., Boiarskaia R.V. Konstruktorsko-tekhnologicheskie osnovy unifikatsii parametrov tsel'nometallicheskikh ballonov vysokogo davleniia v raketno-kosmicheskom mashinostroenii [Design-Engineering Principles of Standardization of Characteristics of Solid-Metal High-Pressure Tanks in Rocket and Space Machine Building]. Vestnik MGTU im. N.E. Baumana. Ser. Mashinostroenie [Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University. Mechanical Engineering]. 2014, no. 5, pp. 70–84.

[2] Vasil'ev V.N. Organizatsiia proizvodstva v usloviiakh rynka [Organization of production in the market]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie publ., 1993. 368 p.

[3] GOST 23945.0–80. Unifikatsiia izdelii. Osnovnye polozheniia [GOST 23945.0-80. Unification of products. The main provisions]. Moscow, Standartinform publ., 1991. 7 p.

[4] Antonov G.A. Osnovy standartizatsii i upravleniia kachestvom produktsii [Fundamentals of standardization and quality control]. Sankt–Peterburg, St. Petersburg State University of Economics publ., 2011. 684 p.

[5] Martino J.P. Technological forecasting for decision making. Hardcover. 2nd ed. Elsevier Science Ltd, 1983. 404 p. (Russ. Ed.: Martino Dzh. Tekhnologicheskoe prognozirovanie. Moscow, Nauka publ., 1997. 460 p.).

[6] Semenov G.E. Razrabotka protsessno-orientirovannogo podkhoda k modelirovaniiu organizatsionno-tekhnologicheskikh vidov deiatel'nosti v proizvodstvennykh sistemakh. Diss. kand. tekhn. nauk. [Development of a process-oriented approach to the modeling of organizational and technological activities in manufacturing systems. Cand. tech. sci. diss.].Moscow, 2003. 144 p.

[7] Tsyrkov G.A. Razrabotka metodiki kompleksnoi avtomatizatsii informatsionnogo soprovozhdeniia protsessov podgotovki proizvodstva slozhnykh tekhnicheskikh system. Diss. kand. tekhn. nauk. [Development of methodology for complex automation of information support of the processes of production preparation for complex technical systems. Cand. tech. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2010. 151 p.

[8] R 50.1.027–2001. Rekomendatsii po standartizatsii. Informatsionnye tekhnologii podderzhki zhiznennogo tsikla produktsii. Avtomatizirovannyi obmen tekhnicheskoi informatsiei. Osnovnye polozheniia i obshchie trebovaniia [P 50.1.027–2001. Recommendations for standardization. Information technology support for the product lifecycle. Automated exchange of technical information. Fundamentals and general requirements]. Moscow, Standartinform<неиpubl., 2001. 39 p.

[9] R 50.1.028–2001. Rekomendatsii po standartizatsii. Informatsionnye tekhnologii podderzhki zhiznennogo tsikla produktsii. Metodologiia funktsional'nogo modelirovaniia [P 50.1.027–2001. Continuous acquisition and life-cycle support. Methodology of functional modeling]. Moscow, Standartinform publ., 2002. 78 p.

[10] R 50.1.031–2001. Rekomendatsii po standartizatsii. Informatsionnye tekhnologii podderzhki zhiznennogo tsikla produktsii. Terminologicheskii slovar'. Chast' 1 Stadii zhiznennogo tsikla produktsii [Р 50.1.031–2001. Continuous acquisition and life-cycle support. Glossary. Part 1. Product life-cycle stages]. Moscow, Standartinform publ., 2002. 36 p.

[11] Ostroverkh A.I. Osnovnye printsipy sovershenstvovaniia organizatsionno-tekhnologicheskogo soprovozhdeniia proizvodstvennykh protsessov v mashinostroenii. Diss. dokt. tekhn. nauk. [Fundamentals for improved organizational and technological support of production processes at machinery production. Dr. tech. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2007. 287 p.

[12] Novye naukoemkie tekhnologii v tekhnike: Entsiklopediia. T. 12. Tekhnologicheskoe obespechenie slozhnykh tekhnicheskikh sistem. Chast' 1 [New high technologies in engineering: Encyclopedia. Vol. 12. Technological support of complex technical systems. Pt 1]. Ed. Kasaev K.S. Moscow, ZAO NII «ENTsITEKh» publ., 1998. 396 p.

[13] Klimenko Iu., Lysyi S., Medushevskii L. Mezhdunarodnaia standartizatsiia kommercheskoi raketno-kosmicheskoi tekhniki [International Standardization of Commercial CosmicMissile Systems]. Elektronika: nauka, tekhnologiia, biznes [Electronics: Science, Technology, Business]. 2001, no. 5, p. 74.

[14] Filatov A.N., Sterlikov K.V., Mikushkina S.M. Tekhnologiia niskhodiashchego proektirovaniia izdelii RKT, osnovannaia na resheniiakh kompanii PTC [Technology top-down design of aerospace hardware-based solutions of PTC]. Ratsional'noe upravlenie predpriiatiem [Rational Enterprise Management]. 2013, no. 2, pp. 46–49.

[15] Prudnikov V.A. Metodika sistemnogo proektirovaniia kompleksa sredstv tekhnologicheskogo osnashcheniia dlia ispytanii agregatov sistem upravleniia raketno-kosmicheskoi tekhniki na etape proizvodstva. Diss. kand. tekhn. nauk. [Methodology of system design for complex of technological equipment means for testing of control systems aggregates of space rocket engineering at the production stage. Cand. tech. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2006. 150 p.

[16] Petrov A.V. Modelirovanie organizatsionno-tekhnologicheskoi sredy sozdaniia raketnokosmicheskoi tekhniki [Modeling organizational and technological environment of rocket and space technology]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie publ., 1999. 318 p.

[17] Ostroverkh A.I, Sychev V.N., Tsyrkov A.V. Reinzhiniring sistemy organizatsionnotekhnologicheskogo soprovozhdeniia protsessov proizvodstva raketno-kosmicheskoi tekhniki [Reengineering of organizational and technological support of production processes rocket and space technology]. Tekhnologiia mashinostroeniia [Engineering Technology]. 2006, no. 8, pp. 88–91.

[18] Shenaev M.O. Razrabotka metodiki i sredstv organizatsii tekhnicheskoi podgotovki seriinogo proizvodstva pnevmogidravlicheskikh sistem izdelii aviatsionnoi tekhniki. Diss. kand. tekhn. nauk [Development of methods and means of the organization of technical training for full-scale production of pneumatic hydraulic systems for aeronautical engineering products. Cand. tech. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2009. 146 p.

[19] Aeronautics and space within the Air Liquide Group (2009). Available at: http://www.airliquide.com/file/otherelementcontent/pj/dp%20juin%2009%20ven55801.pdf (accessed 2 November 2014).

[20] Chumadin A.S., Ershov V.I., Barvinok V.A., Agamirov L.V., Andreevskaia Iu.S., Astapov V.Iu., Bogdanovich V.I., Boiarskaia R.V., Gavrilin V.D., Galkin V.I., Dolotov B.I., Ivanov Iu.L., Kirilin A.N., Kiselev A.I., Kozlova O.V., Komarov A.A., Koptev A.N., Kulakov G.A., Makarov K.A., Mar'in B.N., Moiseev V.K., Rusin M.Iu., Semashko N.A., Sviridov A.N., Tarasov V.A., Filimonov A.S., Tsyrkov A.V. Izbrannye glavy po avia- i raketostroeniiu (v konspektakh lektsii) [Selected chapters on aircraft and rocket (in the lecture notes)]. Moscow, Nauka i tekhnologii publ., 2005. 850 p.

[21] Medvedev A.A. Unifikatsiia, kak sredstvo obespecheniia nizkoi udel'noi stoimosti i povysheniia nadezhnosti vyvedeniia poleznoi nagruzki raketami-nositeliami [Unification as a means of providing a low unit cost and improve the reliability of launch payload launcher]. 30 akademicheskie chteniia po kosmonavtike [30 Academic Conference on Astronautics]. Moscow, Komissiia RAN po razrabotke nauchnogo naslediia pionerov osvoeniia kosmicheskogo prostranstva publ., 2009, pp. 252–253.

[22] Semenov G.E. Metodika konstruktivno-tekhnologicheskoi otrabotki gazodinamicheskikh sistem izdelii RKT [Methodology of constructive-process for gas-dynamic systems of products of rocket space engineering (RSE)]. Tezisy dokladov Mezhdunarodnoi molodezhnoi nauchnoi konferentsii «26 Gagarinskie chteniia», Moskva, 11–15 aprelia 2000 g.[Abstracts of the International Youth Conference «26 Gagarin readings», Moscow, 11–15 April 2000]. Moscow, MATI publ., 2000. 237 p.

[23] Ryan Gehm. Scorpius Space Launch propels all-composite tanks forward. SAE International, 2008. Available at: http://articles.sae.org/2866/ (accessed 24 November 2014).

[24] Patrick Ponticel. Manufacturing technology combo a first for aerospace. SAE International, 2010. Available at: http://articles.sae.org/7376/ (accessed 24 November 2014).

[25] Matthew Monaghan. NASA picks Boeing for composite cryogenic propellant tank tests. SAE International, 2011. Available at: http://articles.sae.org/10275/ (accessed 24 November 2014).

[26] Komkov M.A., Tarasov V.A. Tekhnologiia namotki kompozitnykh konstruktsii raket i sredstv porazheniia [Technology winding composite structures missiles and weapons]. Moscow, Bauman Press, 2011. 431 p.