On Geometry Deviations of the Small Vessel Components Obtained Using Additive Technologies
Authors: Dektyarev A.V., Zobov P.G., Dzyunin G.R., Morozov V.N. | Published: 02.07.2022 |
Published in issue: #7(748)/2022 | |
Category: Mechanical Engineering and Machine Science | Chapter: Manufacturing Engineering | |
Keywords: additive technologies, 3D printing, manufacturing precision, tolerance field, glued polylactide products, building elements |
Currently, there is not enough data on the cumulative error in the geometric characteristics of large-sized objects assembled using the technology of gluing in parts. The hull of the small vessel "Nerl" was chosen as a large-sized object created by the FDM method. The deviations of the diameter along mutually perpendicular planes and the heights of the glued products were measured on the example of test specimens of a cylindrical shape and gluings from them. The field of tolerance for glued products made of polylactide was determined. Recommendations for designing large-sized products when printing in parts by the FDM method were issued. The causes for the appearance of geometric deviations of single parts and gluings are described. The main disadvantages of the FDM method related to manufacturing accuracy are considered. Causes of geometric deviations are divided into three groups. The first is related to the parameters of the product material (thermal expansion coefficient, uniformity of the rod and hygroscopicity), the second is related to its design (multiplicity of linear dimensions, layer height and motor pitch, filling parameters, the presence and size of overhanging elements), the third is related to the features of the additive installation ( calibration along the X, Y, and Z axis, extrusion drive calibration, extrusion unit design, acceleration and travel speed, and nozzle diameter). It was found that preparing the production of 3D printing of a large-sized object using the technology of gluing in parts, for example, the hull of a small vessel, it is necessary to additionally take into account the numerical parameters of the layers of adhesive joints.
References
[1] Dektyarev A.V., Morozov V.N., Yafasov A.Ya. Additive technologies in shipbuilding:trends and legal regulation. Morskie intellektual’nye tekhnologii [Marine Intellectual Technologies], 2019, no. 4–4, pp. 38–49. (In Russ.).
[2] Wu P., Wang J., Wang X. A critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the construction industry. Autom. Constr., 2016, vol. 68, pp. 21–31, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.005
[3] Hager I., Golonka A., Putanowicz R. 3D printing of buildings and building components as the future of sustainable construction? Procedia Eng., 2016, vol. 151, pp. 292–299, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.357
[4] Sakin M., Kiroglu Y.C. 3D printing of buildings: construction of the sustainable houses of the future by BIM. Energy Procedia, 2017, vol. 134, pp. 702–711, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.562
[5] Cortés Carmona A. Estudio de la viabilidad de la tecnología de impresión 3d aplicada al sector de la construcción naval. Bachelor’s thesis. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2019. 84 p.
[6] Stadler A.T., Schönauer M., Aslani R. et al. The impact of a flexible stern on canoe boat maneuverability and speed. Biomimetics, 2020, vol. 5, no. 1, art. 7, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics5010007
[7] Zobov P.G., Dektyarev A.V., Morozov V.N. Modern 3D-scanning methods for dimensional analysis of ship models taking into account their additive manufacturing. Izvestiya KGTU [KSTU News], 2019, no. 53, pp. 151–161. (In Russ.).
[8] Dektyarev A.V., Zobov P.G., Nikolaev I.I. et al. Experience of using 3D-printing in ship modeling while investigating towing resistance of a small-sized vessel in an experimental tank. Izvestiya KGTU [KSTU News], 2019, no. 54, pp. 166–177. (In Russ.).
[9] Zobov P.G., Dektyarev A.V., Morozov V.N. New formula of adhesion joint for polylactide parts. Vestnik molodezhnoy nauki, 2020, no. 1. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42765788 (in Russ.).
[10] Recommended procedures. Procedure 7.5-01-01-01. Rev. 01.ITTC. 23rd ITTC, 2002. URL: https://www.ittc.info/media/1804/75-01-01-01.pdf (accessed: 15.01.25022).
[11] Resistance uncertainly analysis, example for resistance test. Procedure 7.5-02-02-02. Rev. 01. 23rd ITTC, 2002. URL: https://ittc.info/media/2021/75-02-02-02.pdf (accessed: 15.01.25022).
[12] Hernandez D.D. Factors affecting dimensional precision of consumer 3D printing. Int. J. Aviat. Aeronaut. Aeros., 2015, vol. 2, no. 4, doi: https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2015.1085
[13] Liu Z., Zhang M., Bhandari B. et al. 3D printing: printing precision and application in food sector. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 2017, vol. 69-A, pp. 83–94, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.018
[14] Xia M., Nematollahi B., Sanjayan J. Printability, accuracy and strength of geopolymer made using powder-based 3D printing for construction applications. Autom. Constr., 2019, vol. 101, pp. 179–189, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.013
[15] Chung M., Radacsi N., Robert C. et al. On the optimization of low-cost FDM 3D printers for accurate replication of patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry. 3D Print. Med., 2018, vol. 4, no. 1, art. 2, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-017-0023-2
[16] Cardona C., Curdes A.H., Isaacs A.J. Effects of filament diameter tolerances in fused filament fabrication. IUJUR, 2016, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 44–47, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14434/iujur.v2i1.20917
[17] Shen Z.H., Dai N., Li D.W. et al. Bridge support structure generation for 3D printing. Proc. MMTEI2015, 2016, pp. 141–149, doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813109384_0016
[18] Jiang J., Lou J., Hu G. Effect of support on printed properties in fused deposition modelling processes. Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 2019, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 308–315, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2019.1568835
[19] Alsoufi M.S., Alhazmi M.W., Suker D.K. et al. Experimental characterization of the influence of nozzle temperature in FDM 3D printed pure PLA and advanced PLA+. AJME, 2019, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 45–60, doi: https://doi.org/10.12691/ajme-7-2-1
[20] Dektyarev A.V. On the planning and implementation of the project for the creation of the department (bureau) of additive technologies at "Yantar" Baltic shipbuilding plant. Morskie intellektual’nye tekhnologii [Marine Intellectual Technologies], 2020, no. 3–1, pp. 110–119, doi: https://doi.org/10.37220/MIT.2020.49.3.014 (in Russ.).