Evaluation of the imprint geometric parameters and pressure in the working tool contact zone under the reversible surface plastic deformation
Authors: Zaides S.A., Huu Hai Nguyen | Published: 24.02.2023 |
Published in issue: #3(756)/2023 | |
Category: Mechanical Engineering and Machine Science | Chapter: Manufacturing Engineering | |
Keywords: reversible surface plastic deformation, kinematic parameters, plastic imprint, contact pressure, reverse rotation speed |
The article presents the results of modeling and determining the influence of the parameters of reverse surface plastic deformation on the geometric characteristics of the plastic imprint and the pressure in the contact zone of the working tool under static and reverse impact. Using the software for 3D design SOLID WORKS-2019 and computational modeling in ANSYS-19.1, a finite element model of the contact zone was built to determine the geometric characteristics of the plastic indentation and the contact pressure between the working tool and the surface of the workpiece, depending on the geometry of the working tool, reversing frequency its rotation, the initial angle of installation and the amplitude of the angle of reverse rotation of the working tool. Based on the obtained results, to increase the pressure in the contact zone of the working tool with the workpiece, which affects the degree of hardening and smoothing of microroughnesses of the workpiece surface and the formation of compressive residual stresses, it is recommended to use the following parameters and hardening modes: working roller with a diameter of 20–30 mm, with a profile radius of 2 –2.5 mm, distance between tops of working roller profile 1.5–2 mm, initial installation angle of the working roller 90о, amplitude of the reverse rotation angle of the working roller ±6 – ±8о and reverse speed of the working roller 200–240 double strokes/min.
References
[1] Odintsov L.G. Uprochnenie i otdelka detaley poverkhnostnym plasticheskim deformirovaniem [Strengthening and finishing of parts by surface plastic deformation]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1987. 328 p. (In Russ.).
[2] Smelyanskiy V.M. Mekhanika uprochneniya detaley poverkhnostnym plasticheskim deformirovaniem [Mechanics of hardening parts by surface plastic deformation]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 2002. 300 p. (In Russ.).
[3] Sulima A.M., Shulov V.A., Yagodkin Yu.D. Poverkhnostnyy sloy i ekspluatatsionnye svoystva detaley mashin [Surface layer and exploitation properties of machine parts]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1988. 239 p. (In Russ.).
[4] Blyumenshteyn V.Yu. Innovation technologies in finish-strengthening with surface plastic deformation in transport complex. Naukoemkie tekhnologii v mashinostroenii [Science Intensive Technologies in Mechanical Engineering], 2019, no. 8, pp. 16–24, doi: https://doi.org/10.30987/article_5d2635cb370c77.32034089 (in Russ.).
[5] Gorlenko O.A., Kostenko R.P. Technological support for curvilinear surface roughness parameters in diamond smoothing. STIN, 2000, no. 6, pp. 21–24. (In Russ.).
[6] Grigoryev S.N., Kropotkina E.Yu. Methodology for choosing an optimal technique for surface plastic forming. Vestnik MGTU STANKIN [Vestnik MSUT Stankin], 2012, no. 2, pp. 144–147. (In Russ.).
[7] Makhalov M.S. Calculation model of residual stresses in a surface layer after hardening by surface plastic deformation. Polzunovskiy almanakh, 2012, no. 1. URL: http://elib.altstu.ru/journals/Files/pa2012_1/pdf/149mahalov.pdf (in Russ.).
[8] Gurov R.V. Surface layer quality formation during finishing and finishing-strengthening modes of finishing-strengthening treatment by surface plastic deformation. Vestnik BGTU [Bulletin of Bryansk State Technical University], 2011, no. 3, pp. 67–73. (In Russ.).
[9] Trunin A.V., Sidyakin Yu.I., Abakumova S.Yu. et al. Assessment of residual stress intensity in shafts during RPM. Izvestiya VolGTU [Izvestia Volgograd State Technical University], 2013, no. 20, pp. 67–70. (In Russ.).
[10] Makhalov M.S., Blyumenshteyn V.Yu. Surface plastic deformation mechanics. the residual stresses in the hardened elastic-plastic body. Obrabotka metallov (tekhnologiya, oborudovanie, instrumenty) [Metal Working and Material Science], 2019, no. 2, pp. 110–123, doi: https://doi.org/10.17212/1994-6309-2019-21.2-110-123 (in Russ.).
[11] Sidyakin Yu.I., Osipenko A.P., Bocharov D.A. Upgrading the shafts strain-hardening treatment by surface plastic deformation. Uprochnyayushchie tekhnologii i pokrytiya [Strengthening Technologies and Coatings], 2007, no. 8, pp. 23–26. (In Russ.).
[12] Poletaev V.A. Processes of surface plastic deformation. NOVAINFO.RU, 2018, no. 80, pp. 1–5. (In Russ.).
[13] Kolobkov A.V. New tool designs for surface plastic deformation of holes. Vestnik RGATA im. P.A. Solovyeva [Vestnik of P.A. Solovyov Rybinsk State Aviation Technical University], 2008, no. 1, pp. 61–65. (In Russ.).
[14] Zaydes S.A. From plastic imprint in implementation of working tool to creation of new processes of fi nishing and strengthening treatment. Uprochnyayushchie tekhnologii i pokrytiya [Strengthening Technologies and Coatings], 2019, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 399–403. (In Russ.).
[15] Matlin M.M., Mozgunova A.I., Lebskiy S.L. Prediction of hardening parameters of machine parts by surface plastic deformation. Izvestiya VolGTU [Izvestia Volgograd State Technical University], 2005, no. 3, pp. 52–55. (In Russ.).
[16] Kochetkov A.V., Barats F.Ya., Shashkov I.G. The review of researches of finishing strengthening processing by a method of superficial plastic deformation. Naukovedenie, 2013, no. 4. URL: https://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/38tvn413.pdf (in Russ.).
[17] Korobeynikov V.V. Methods of machining of details surfacing plastic deformation. Trudy RGUPS, 2016, no. 3, pp. 77–81. (In Russ.).
[18] Ngo K.K., Zaydes S.A. Influence of local surface plastic deformation kinematics on stress-strain state in the deformation zone. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University], 2017, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 39–47, doi: https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2017-3-39-47 (in Russ.).
[19] Zaydes S.A., Kho M.K. Pendulum surface plastic deformation of cylindrical blanks. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Chernaya metallurgiya [Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy], 2022, no. 5, pp. 344–353, doi: https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2022-5-344-353 (in Russ.).
[20] Zaydes S.A., Nguen Kh.Kh. Influence of kinematics of a toroidal roller on the stress-strain state under surface plastic deformation. Metalloobrabotka, 2022, no. 2, pp. 40–48, doi: https://doi.org/10.25960/mo.2022.2.40 (in Russ.).
[21] Zaydes S.A., Nguen Kh.Kh. Sposob poverkhnostnogo plasticheskogo deformirovaniya naruzhnykh poverkhnostey tel vrashcheniya [Method for surface plastic deformation of the outer surfaces of bodies of rotation]. Patent RU 2758713. Appl., 14.01.2021, publ. 01.11.2021. (In Russ.).
[22] Zaydes S.A., Nguen Kh.Kh. Influence of the toroidal cutter kinematics on elastic state of the machine parts surface bed. Naukoemkie tekhnologii v mashinostroenii [Science Intensive Technologies in Mechanical Engineering], 2022, no. 6, pp. 12–21, doi: https://doi.org/10.30987/2223-4608-2022-6-12-21 (in Russ.).
[23] Zaydes S.A., Nguen Kh.Kh. The influence of the main parameters of the reversible surface plastic deformation on the stress-strain state of cylindrical parts. Sistemy. Metody. Tekhnologii [Systems. Methods. Technologies], 2022, no. 3, pp. 7–15. (In Russ.).
[24] Vinciguerra V., Malgioglio G.L., Landi A. Modelling the elastic energy of a bifurcated wafer: a benchmark of the analytical solution vs. the ANSYS finite element analysis. Compos. Struct., 2022, vol. 281, art. 114996, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114996
[25] Bakov K.A. ANSYS. Spravochnik polzovatelya [ANSYS user guide]. Moscow, DMK Press Publ., 2005. 650 p. (In Russ.).