Development of the digital twins’ typical architecture in the mechanical engineering enterprise production and logistics systems at different stages of their lifecycle
Authors: Nikishechkin P.A., Dolgov V.A., Grigoriev S.N. | Published: 28.04.2023 |
Published in issue: #5(758)/2023 | |
Category: Mechanical Engineering and Machine Science | Chapter: Technology and Equipment for Mechanical and Physico-Technical Processing | |
Keywords: digital twin of an object, mechanical engineering enterprise, production and logistics system, digital twins architecture, life cycle, information system |
Information technology improvement is changing approaches to managing the product and complex systems life cycle, as well as the methods used in studying the complex processes. Recently, digital twins of objects, processes and systems are being increasingly developed, which involves creation of their virtual copies that could be used to investigate and predict behavior of the object in question. Generalized architecture of digital twins of objects, which include products, processes and systems, is provided. Issues of building digital twins for a mechanical engineering enterprise are outlined. It is shown that it becomes possible to design and develop a multicity of digital twins for various objects of the same mechanical engineering enterprise, each of them would solve its specific problems. The paper considers digital twins of the mechanical engineering enterprise production and logistics system, its typical architecture and digital twin alteration at various stages of its life cycle. It is shown that building digital twins of the production and logistics system at various stages of its life cycle provides support in making organizational and technological decisions in order to increase efficiency of the production and logistics system. Main classes of the information systems used to build digital twins of the production and logistics system at the design and operation stages are described.
References
[1] Grieves M. Origins of the digital twin concept, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26367.61609
[2] Tsarev M.V., Andreev Yu.S. Digital twins: definition, approaches and methods of development. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Mashinostroenie [BMSTU Journal of Mechanical Engineering], 2021, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 517–531, doi: https://doi.org/10.17586/0021-3454-2021-64-7-517-531 (in Russ.).
[3] Cheng J., Zhang H., Tao F. et al. DT-II:Digital twin enhanced Industrial Internet reference framework towards smart manufacturing. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 2020, vol. 62, art. 101881, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101881
[4] Borovkov A.I., Ryabov Yu.A. [Digital twins in industry: development history, classification, technologies, use cases]. Sb. tr. nauch.-prakt. konf. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya ekonomiki i promyshlennosti [Proc. Sci.-Pract. Conf. Digital Transformation of Economy and Industry]. Sankt-Petersburg, SPbPU Publ., 2019, pp. 234–245. (In Russ.).
[5] Grigoryev S.N., Dolgov V.A., Nikishechkin P.A. et al. Development of a structural model of a digital twin of machine-building enterprises production and logistics system. Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekh. Univ. im. N.E. Baumana, Mashinostr. [Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Tech. Univ., Mechan. Eng.], 2021, no. 2, pp. 43–58, doi: https://doi.org/10.18698/0236-3941-2021-2-43-58 (in Russ.).
[6] Cimino C., Negri E., Fumagalli L. Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing. Comput. Ind, 2019, vol. 113, art. 103130, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.103130
[7] Grigoryev S.N., Dolgov V.A., Nikishechkin P.A. et al. Simulation modeling production processes of various types of machine-building enterprises. Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekh. Univ. im. N.E. Baumana, Mashinostr. [Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Tech. Univ., Mechan. Eng.], 2022, no. 3, pp. 84–99, doi: https://doi.org/10.18698/0236-3941-2022-3-84-99 (in Russ.).
[8] Nikishechkin P.A., Ivashin S.S., Chernenko V.E. et al. PlantTwin simulation system as a tool for verifying production plans and supporting the decision-making to improve production effectiveness. Vestnik mashinostroeniya, 2021, no. 3, pp. 80–85, doi: https://doi.org/10.36652/0042-4633-2021-3-80-85 (in Russ.).
[9] Davis J., Edgar T., Porter J. et al. Smart manufacturing, manufacturing intelligence and demand-dynamic performance. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2012, vol. 47, pp. 145–156, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.037
[10] Grigoryev S.N., Dolgov V.A., Podkidyshev A.A. et al. Managing the workplaces capacity when changing the nomenclature and manufacturing program of parts in discrete production. Vestnik mashinostroeniya, 2022, no. 7, pp. 85–88. (In Russ.).
[11] Nikishechkin P.A., Chervonnova N.Y., Nikich A.N. An approach of developing solution for monitoring the status and parameters of technological equipment for the implementation of Industry 4.0. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2020, vol. 709, no. 4, art. 044065, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/709/4/044065
[12] Grigoriev S.N., Martinov G.M. An ARM-based multi-channel CNC solution for multi-tasking turning and milling machines. Procedia CIRP, 2016, vol. 46, pp. 525–528, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.036
[13] Hao Z., Qiang L., Xin C. et al. A digital twin-based approach for designing and multi-objective optimization of hollow glass production line. IEEE Access, 2017, vol. 5, pp. 26901–26911, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2766453
[14] Grigoriev S.N., Martinov G.M. Scalable open cross-platform kernel of PCNC system for multi-axis machine tool. Procedia CIRP, 2012, vol. 1, pp. 238–243, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2012.04.043
[15] Tao F., Liu A., Hu T. et al. Digital twin driven smart design. Elsevier, 2020. 358 p.
[16] Grigoriev S.N., Masterenko D.A., Teleshevskii V.I. et al. Contemporary state and outlook for development of metrological assurance in the machine-building industry. Meas. Tech., 2013, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 1311–1315, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-013-0126-0
[17] Grigoriev S.N., Sinopalnikov V.A., Tereshin M.V. et al. Control of parameters of the cutting process on the basis of diagnostics of the machine tool and workpiece. Meas. Tech., 2012, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 555–558, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-012-9999-6
[18] Grigoriev S.N., Gurin V.D., Volosova M.A. et al. Development of residual cutting tool life prediction algorithm by processing on CNC machine tool. Materwiss. Werksttech., 2013, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 790–796, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201300068