Mathematical model of a hydraulic drive with an air-hydro pressure multiplier

The article describes a mathematical model of a hydraulic drive with a pneumatic-hydraulic pressure intensifier, which allows analyzing system performance parameters depending on various design and operational factors. The use of digital technologies significantly enhances the efficiency and accuracy of pneumatic-hydraulic systems. Digitization of such drives is an essential step in the evolution of technological equipment, opening new prospects for industry and innovation. Modern data analysis methods, mathematical modeling, and machine learning algorithms are applied for the successful implementation of this approach. Mathematical modeling enables the integration of digital technologies into pneumatic-hydraulic drives of modern equipment, improving system dynamics and accuracy through combined control of fluid supply and return. It also ensures load sensitivity by aligning load force with drive pressure to increase efficiency.
EDN: FCYGKB, https://elibrary/fcygkb

References

[1] Maslov M.M. Application of pneumohydraulic drive for repair on the example of universal remover. Vestnik NGIEI [Bulletin NGIEI], 2013, no. 8, pp. 54–62. EDN: RBNMZB (in Russ.).

[2] Vasilyev V.N. Organizatsiya proizvodstva v usloviyakh rynka [Organization of production in market conditions]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1993. 366 p. (In Russ.).

[3] Linjama M. Digital fluid power — state of the art. 12th Scandinavian Int. Conf. on Fluid Power. Tampere University of Technology, 2011, pp. 18–20.

[4] Donkov V.H., Andersen T., Linjama M. et al. Digital hydraulic technology for linear actuation: a state of the art review. Int. J. Fluid Power, 2020, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 263–304, doi: https://doi.org/10.13052/ijfp1439-9776.2125

[5] Laamanen A., Linjama M., Vilenius M. On the pressure peak minimization in digital hydraulics. 10th Scandinavian Int. Conf. on Fluid Power. Tampere University of Technology, 2007, pp. 107–121.

[6] Gerts E.V., Kreynin G.V. Dinamika pnevmaticheskikh privodov mashin-avtomatov [Dynamics of pneumatic drives of automatic machines]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1964. 236 p. (In Russ.).

[7] Gerts E.V., Kreynin G.V. Sintez pnevmaticheskikh privodov [Synthesis of pneumatic drives]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1966. 212 p. (In Russ.).

[8] Laptev Yu.N., ed. Gidrosistemy vysokikh davleniy [Hydrosystems of high pressures]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1973. 151 p. (In Russ.).

[9] Donskoy A.S. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie protsessov v pnevmaticheskikh privodakh [Mathematical modeling of processes in pneumatic drives]. Sankt-Petersburg, Izd-vo Politekhn. un-ta Publ., 2008. 120 p. (In Russ.).

[10] Saaksvuori A., Immonen A. Product lifecycle management. Springer, 2008. 254 p.

[11] Grieves M. Digital twin: manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication. White Paper, 2014, pp. 1–7.

[12] Grieves M., Vickers J. Digital twin: mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In: Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems. Springer, 2017, pp. 85–113, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4

[13] Glaessgen E.H., Stargel D.S. The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and U.S. air force vehicles. 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf., 2012, pp. 1–14, doi: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1818

[14] Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK). sebokwiki.org: website. URL: https://sebokwiki.org/wiki (accessed 22.04.2024).

[15] Chatti S., Laperrière L., Reinhart G. et al. CIRP encyclopedia of production engineering. Springer, 2019. 1832 p.

[16] Semeraro C. et al. Digital twin paradigm: a systematic literature review. Comput. Ind., 2021, vol. 130, art. 103469, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103469