An Analysis of Stiffness Matrices of Tube Elements to Assess the Correctness of Modeling Curved Elements of Pipeline Systems
Authors: Shelofast V.V., Shelofast V.V. | Published: 30.05.2020 |
Published in issue: #5(722)/2020 | |
Category: Mechanical Engineering and Machine Science | Chapter: Machine Science | |
Keywords: stiffness matrix, ductility matrix, nodal load vector, shape functions, nodal displacements, normal stresses |
Large-scale work to create a Russian engineering analysis system involves the implementation of a considerable number of specialized tasks, each of which requires an individual approach and specific solutions. The calculation of pipeline systems that can most easily be performed in the version using rods is no exception. Such an approach is the most effective in terms of increasing the speed of calculations, increasing the dimension of the tasks performed, and most importantly, in simplifying the modeling procedure. In this paper, the authors consider the option of determining the stiffness matrices of a spatial element for modeling of pipes, which underlie the full engineering analysis of pipeline systems. Verification examples that confirm the reliability and correctness of the obtained solutions are presented.
References
[1] ANSYS (v.12.1) Help. Elektronnyy resurs. Available at: https://www.ansys.com.
[2] ANSYS Workbench Verification Manual, Release 15.0. ANSYS, Inc, 2013. Available at: https://ecourses.ou.edu/fem/manuals/ANSYS_Workbench_Verification_Manual_v18.2.pdf.
[3] Bathe K.-J. Finite element procedures. Englewood, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 1996. 1065 p.
[4] Hovgaard W. Stress in three dimensional pipe-bends. Transactions of ASME, 1935, vol. 57, pp. 401–416.
[5] Kohnke P. Ansys, Inc. Theory, Release 5.7. SAS IP, 2001. 1126 p.
[6] Liang-Chuan Peng, Tsen-Loong Peng. Pipe stress engineering. ASME, 2009. 506 p.
[7] Mecaniciens Societe Francaise des Guide de validation des progiciels de calcul de structures. Test no. SSLL08/89. Paris, Afnor Technique, 1990.
[8] Thiagarajan N., Dhananjay R., Shakti Prasad. Stiffness of Pipe Elbow. Interna-tional Conference on Mechanical, Production and Automobile Engineering, Pattaya, 2011, pp. 230–234.
[9] Tulk J.D. Correlation Between Dynamic Stress and Vibration Velocity in Com-plex Piping Systems. Canadian Electrical Association, 1988. 46 p.
[10] Young W.C., Budynas R.G., Sadegh A.M. Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2002. - obshcheye kolichestvo stranits?
[11] Zienkiewicz O.C., Taylor R.L. The finite element method. Solid mechanics. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000, vol. 2, 476 p.
[12] Zienkiewicz O.C., Taylor R.L. The finite element method. The basis. Butter-worth-Heinemann, 2000, vol. 1, 708 p.
[13] Agapov P. Metod konechnykh elementov v statike, dinamike i ustoychivosti prostranstvennykh tonkostennykh podkreplennykh konstruktsiy [The finite element method in the statics, dynamics and stability of spatial thin-walled reinforced structures]. Moscow, ASV publ., 2000. 152 p.
[14] Feodos’yev V.I. Soprotivleniye materialov [Strength of materials]. Moscow, Nauka publ., 1972. 544 p.