Mobile speleological parallel robot with a spatial tactile system for identification of the contact surface

The paper considers the problem of conducting speleological studies of natural and artificial caves, including channels of the underground rivers, as well as various mine workings in dangerous or inaccessible conditions for a speleologist. In this case, external environment of the objects under study could turn out to be opaque for optical, radio, ultrasonic and other physical methods of monitoring the inner surface, for example, due to partial or complete flooding of the object with water with inhomogeneous suspensions. A solution to the problem is proposed by robotizing the research using a mobile speleological parallel robot (MSPR) with a spatial tactile system for identification of the contact surface. MSPR is created in the form of an active octahedral structure, which edges are rods with linear drives. The rod ends are pivotally connected to the corresponding vertices of the active octahedral structure ensuring its geometric invariability when the linear drives are turned off. As a result, MSPR is able to carry out contact (tactile) mapping of the inner surface under study regardless of the external environment transparency and its geodetic binding to the base coordinate system with visualization in the form of histograms. At the same time, MSPR is able to self-move along the internal surfaces regardless of their spatial orientation. MSPR and its functionalities are described, one of which is the ability to build the 3D histograms of the surrounding space bind to the base (inertial) coordinate system through the mechanical contact. The tactile system of identifying the contact surface makes it possible not only to move the MSPR, but also to tactilely monitor in the external environment that is opaque for optical, radio, ultrasonic and other physical control methods. MSPR allows robotizing speleological research in dangerous, hard-to-reach and inaccessible places for a speleologist, as well as to carry out rescue operations and ensure delivery of the required cargo.

References

[1] Dublyanskiy V.N., Ilyukhin V.V. Puteshestviya pod zemley [Travelling underground]. Moscow, Fizkul’tura i sport Publ., 1981. 192 p. (In Russ.).

[2] Dublyanskiy V.N., Andreychuk V.N. Speleologiya. Terminologiya, svyazi s drugimi naukami, klassifikatsiya polostey [Speleology. Terminology, connection with other sciences, classification of cavities]. Sverdlovsk, UrO RAN SSSR, 1989. 33 p. (In Russ.).

[3] Dublyanskiy V.N. Zanimatel’naya speleologiya [Engaging speleology]. Chelyabinsk, Ural LTD, 2000. 525 p. (In Russ.).

[4] Santos A.S., Azpurua H.I., Pessin G. et al. Path planning for mobile robots on rough terrain. Proc. 2018 Latin American Robotic Symp., SBR and WRE, 2018, pp. 265–270, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS/SBR/WRE.2018.00056

[5] Pochemu peshchera Nutty Putty v shtate Yuta zapechatana odnim speleologom vnutri [Why Utah’s Nutty Putty cave is sealed up with one spelunker inside]. sigma-z.ru: website. https://sigma-z.ru/pochemu-peshhera-nutty-putty-v-shtate-yuta-zapechatana-odnim-speleologom-vnutri/ (accessed: 01.03.2022).

[6] Tabib W., Goel K., Yao J. et al. Autonomous cave surveying with an aerial robot. IEEE Trans. Robot., 2022, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1016–1032, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2021.3104459

[7] Wong C., Yang E., Yan X.T. et al. An overview of robotics and autonomous systems for harsh environments. Proc. 23rd ICAC, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.23919/IConAC.2017.8082020

[8] Azpurua H., Rezende A., Potje G. et al. Towards semi-autonomous robotic inspection and mapping in confined spaces with the EspeleoRobo. J. Intell. Robot. Syst., 2021, vol. 101, no. 4, art. 69, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01321-5

[9] Kamenolomnya «Volodary» («Kur’ya») [«Volodary» («Kur’ya») quarry]. places.moscow: website. https://places.moscow/places/kamenolomnya_volodary_kurya/kamenolomnya_volodary_kurya.html (accessed: 01.03.2022). (In Russ.).

[10] Two days in an underwater cave running out of oxygen. japict.com: website. https://japict.com/Nature/Two-Days-In-An-Underwater-Cave-Running-Out-Of-Oxygen-Bbc-News-2325292/ (accessed: 01.03.2022).

[11] Azpurua H., Rocha F., Garcia G. et al. EspeleoRobô — a robotic device to inspect confined environments. Proc. 19th ICAR, 2019, pp. 17–23, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAR46387.2019.8981627

[12] Kashem S., Sufyan H. A novel design of an aquatic walking robot having webbed feet. Int. J. Autom. Comput., 2017, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 576–588, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-017-1075-x

[13] Richardson R., Whitehead S., Ng T.C. et al. The “Djedi” robot exploration of the southern shaft of the Queen’s chamber in the great Pyramid of Giza, Egypt. J. Field Robot., 2013, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 323–348, https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21451

[14] Sayapin S.N., Sinev A.V. Adaptivnyy mobil’nyy prostranstvennyy robot-manipulyator i sposob organizatsii dvizheniy i kontrolya fiziko-mekhanicheskikh svoystv i geometricheskoy formy kontaktiruyushchey poverkhnosti i traektorii peremeshcheniya s ego pomoshch’yu [Adaptive mobile 3d manipulator robot and method of organising displacements and control over physical-mechanical properties, geometrical shape of contact surface and displacement trajectory hereby]. Patent RU 2424893. Appl. 11.01.2009, publ. 20.07.2011. (In Russ.).

[15] Sayapin S.N. Parallel spatial robots of dodecapod type. J. Mach. Manuf. Reliab., 2012, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 457–466, doi: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1052618812060143

[16] Sayapin S.N. Features of individual and collective operation of mobile sems modular type on basis of octahedral dodekapod in conditions of incomplete certainty. In: Smart electromechanical systems. Springer, 2020, pp. 35–55.

[17] Glazunov V.A., Koliskor A.Sh., Kraynev A.F. Prostranstvennye mekhanizmy parallel’noy struktury [Spatial parallel mechanisms]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1991. 95 p. (In Russ.).

[18] Lloyd O.C. Cave rescue: Edward Long Fox memorial lecture 1960. The Medical Journal of the South-West, 1961, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 37–49.

[19] Mirza A., Amundson C. Manual of U.S. Cave rescue techniques. National Speleological Society, 2015. 364 p.